Palestinians to Sudan.

Since the beginning of the Iraq War, around 3,000 Palestinians who lived in the country have been rotting in a no man's land on the Syrian border.

The Syrian authorities, usually lenient with Iraqi refugees, have refused to let the Palestinians cross the border. The logic being that they should only be allowed to return to Palestine.

European countries have volunteered to accept them, but the Arab League vetoed the offer. As we know, Palestinian refugees should only be allowed to return to Palestine, or be resettled (or is it unsettled?)in an Arab country.

Ironically, Jewish NGOs in the US tried to help, if only to show they had high humanitarian standards. Unfortunately, their good will could not accomodate the mention of the words "Palestinian refugees" in official documentation, so they dropped the case.

Now Sudan wants to receive the refugees. After all, Saddam Hussein used them for sectarian reasons to beef up the local Sunnis. Bachir will use them for ethnic reasons, to increase the number of Arabs.

The triumphal events this week in Lebanon remind us how madly in love with the Palestinian cause we are, and how little we actually care about the Palestinians.

Below an article from CNN.


MM.







Plan to send Mideast refugees to Sudan draws protest
From Charley Keyes
CNN

(CNN) -- Palestinian refugees along the Iraq-Syria border are so desperate, they may accept a U.N. offer to go to Sudan, a country widely condemned for atrocities and genocide in its Darfur region.

Al Tanf camp, where 400 Palestinian refugees are living, is appalling, according to the United Nations. The camp floods regularly, has poor sanitation and problems with garbage disposal.

Thousands of Palestinians fled Iraq during the war, when they were targeted by militias. Now they are caught in limbo, denied access to both Iraq and neighboring Syria. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees said the Palestinians would be resettled in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum, away from Darfur.

Palestinians are the most vulnerable group being targeted in Iraq, said Andrew Harper, the U.N.'s Geneva, Switzerland-based senior Iraq operations manager.

"They literally have nowhere else to flee and in many cases have been denied travel documents," he said. "The international community must act now to help these people. A safe haven needs to be found immediately, outside Iraq."

Washington-based Refugees International, founded in 1979, is asking the United States government to intervene and resettle the nearly 3,000 Palestinians in America.

The U.S. State Department has rejected the request, saying that the relocation plan is voluntary and that Sudan is the best option available to the UNHCR.

"The Palestinians being resettled in Sudan is obviously not an ideal or preferred solution," State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said. "But we accept the judgment of the UNHCR that it is preferable to the Palestinians continuing to be stranded in the border area in extremely dire circumstances."

But Sudan is one of the most violent places in the world. The International Criminal Court announced this week that it is seeking an arrest warrant against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for war crimes. The United States has accused the Sudanese regime of genocide in the killings in western Sudan where an estimated 200,000 have died and many more have been forced to flee.

The alleged crimes stem from a brutal counter-insurgency campaign the Sudanese government conducted after rebels began an uprising in Sudan's western Darfur region in 2003. The United States and much of the world has characterized the campaign as genocide.

Michel Gabaudan, the UNHCR representative in Washington, said that no final decision had been reached on the transfer to Sudan but that no other country had stepped forward to help.

"We have been blatantly unsuccessful in getting other countries to help," he said.

He described the plight of the Palestinian refugees as "dire circumstances," prevented from moving by both Iraq and Syria and with little water or access to services.

"They are stuck in extremely difficult circumstances," Gabaudan said. "The conditions they would live in in Khartoum would be much better than the conditions they are living in now."

Kristele Younes, senior advocate with Refugees International, said the Sudan move won't offer a permanent, stable home and would simply move the refugees from one marginalized situation to another.

"The U.S. government should acknowledge the vulnerability of this stateless population and resettle them here," Younes said in a statement. "It is appalling that Sudan, a country infamous for its violations of international humanitarian law, has stepped in to protect these people when the U.S. would not."